Logically, one would have to assume that the same people who believe that Israel should not form a state also believe that Kurds or other ethnic-cultural minorities, for example, are no longer entitled to their own country/territory.
The history of stateless people at the time of the formation of nation states is tangible and the ‚population groups‘ have a feeling of hopelessness. Why should the idea behind Israel, with the history that follows it, be any more wrong than that of all other persecuted ethnic and cultural minorities? It doesn’t make sense to me that a distinction is being made here. The point is that many people today are flirting with the idea that Israel has no right to exist.
Anyone who flirts with such things and thus joins in with Nazi-speak should not complain when other groups or themselves are met with such ignorance of a problem. This is about basic human rights and not about political finesse.
It is presumptuous of the majority to go after a minority in their attitude.
The joke is that the very people who think they are on the side that rightly questions white settler history are throwing the baby out with the bathwater here, a.) because history must always take into account the unknown X, and b.) because Europe’s history should also be viewed from the perspective of other minorities.
If you take this idea further, it really bites you in the tail at this point.