{"id":215,"date":"2022-11-15T14:48:37","date_gmt":"2022-11-15T13:48:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/?p=215"},"modified":"2022-11-15T14:48:37","modified_gmt":"2022-11-15T13:48:37","slug":"environmental-justice-towards-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/environmental-justice-towards-nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Environmental Justice towards Nature"},"content":{"rendered":"

Protecting Nature for itself<\/h3>\t\t\t

Why do we assume by majority that we need to protect and preserve the world, „nature“, because of our obligation to other people and to ourselves, the coming generation, but not to change the behavior and thinking that caused world destruction in the first place?<\/p>\n

We thus assume, as can be inferred from the rhetoric of environmentalism, by a majority that we do not need to protect nature because of itself.<\/p>\n

This logic is essentially an ethical slippery slope.<\/p>\n

As long as the authoritative canon within humanity continues to view nature in the way that ultimately characterizes the Anthropocene > that is, nature is fundamentally instrumentalized > as long as this extreme of destructive attitudes, most dominantly expressed in the economy (which destroys everything), nothing will change.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>

Proteger la naturaleza por s\u00ed misma<\/h3>\t\t\t

\u00bfPor qu\u00e9 asumimos por mayor\u00eda que necesitamos proteger y preservar el mundo, la „naturaleza“, por nuestra obligaci\u00f3n con otras personas y con nosotros mismos, la generaci\u00f3n venidera, pero no para cambiar el comportamiento y el pensamiento que caus\u00f3 la destrucci\u00f3n del mundo en primer lugar?<\/p>\n

Asumimos as\u00ed, como puede deducirse de la ret\u00f3rica del ecologismo, por mayor\u00eda que no necesitamos proteger la naturaleza por s\u00ed misma.<\/p>\n

Esta l\u00f3gica es esencialmente una pendiente \u00e9tica resbaladiza.<\/p>\n

Mientras el canon autorizado dentro de la humanidad siga viendo la naturaleza de la manera que en \u00faltima instancia caracteriza al Antropoceno > es decir, la naturaleza est\u00e1 fundamentalmente instrumentalizada > mientras este extremo de actitudes destructivas, expresado de manera m\u00e1s dominante en la econom\u00eda (que lo destruye todo), nada cambiar\u00e1.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>

Die Natur wegen ihrer Selbst sch\u00fctzen<\/h3>\t\t\t

Warum gehen wir davon mehrheitlich aus, dass wir die Welt, die \u201eNatur\u201c, wegen unserer Verpflichtung gegen\u00fcber anderen Menschen und uns selbst, den kommenden Generation, sch\u00fctzen und erhalten m\u00fcssen, jedoch nicht das Verhalten und das Denken \u00e4ndern m\u00fcssen, das Weltzerst\u00f6rung erst verursacht hat?<\/p>\n

Wir gehen \u2013 so l\u00e4sst sich aus der Rhetorik des Umweltschutzes schlie\u00dfen \u2013 somit mehrheitlich davon aus, dass wir die Natur nicht wegen ihrer Selbst sch\u00fctzen m\u00fcssen.<\/p>\n

Diese Logik ist im Wesentlichen ein ethischer Slippery Slope.<\/p>\n

Solange der ma\u00dfgebliche Kanon innerhalb der Menschheit die Natur weiterhin so betrachtet, wie es das Anthropoz\u00e4n schlie\u00dflich kennzeichnet > das hei\u00dft die Natur wird grundlegend instrumentalisiert > solange wird sich an diesem Extrem destruktiver Haltungen, die am dominantesten Ausdruck in der Wirtschaft finden, (die alles vernichtet) nichts \u00e4ndern.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Why do we assume by majority that we need to protect and preserve the world, „nature“, because of our obligation to other people and to ourselves, the coming generation, but not to change the behavior and thinking that caused world destruction in the first place? We thus assume, as can be inferred from the rhetoric…Weiterlesen<\/span>Environmental Justice towards Nature<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":51,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[19,7],"tags":[12,14,20],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":220,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215\/revisions\/220"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/sprechen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}