back to
"my AR pages"-index
Do humans
reduce animals to human terms?
If we can't
comprehend how another animal lives - in terms of relevancy to human life - does
it give us the right to subjugate the animals under human supremacism?
If animals
live different philosophies compared to the human philosophies of life, can we
rule out the right of their physical entity they live as?
What is human?
Does human mean taking the right to live away from others?
Where does
being a human end? Where the rights of another animal start?
What do human
rights base upon? Why do animals get murdered and discriminated against? Is it a
human right to inflict pain on animals? What is a right?
Can there be
different categories and conceptions practised as rights? Do rights start with
the behaviour species have/show towards each other?
Can rights
only exist stemming from a theoretical contract?
We judge things by
partial 'consequence' and interpretation and not by 'existence' ... in
explaining what THOUGHT is: 'A'
would think, then this part of brain would do that, etc. ... And that
biologically-founded claim on how thinking has to be explained in order to be a
supposedly valid process of thinking, goes, of course, on up to all branches of society,
etc. ... But it isn't
enough to be animal to be an animal?
The border
around the castle 'HUMAN' is the one of scientifical categorizing. Within the
castle we claim to be 'complete'.
BIOLOGICAL
HIERARCHISM ALWAYS PUTS HUMAN 'OBJECTIVITY' ON TOP OF WHAT IT DENIES THE OTHER
SPEICIES: THAT IS ON TOP OF ANIMALS' OBJECTIVITY
How can
absolute objectivity be captured? With which parameters to measure against?
Humans' objectivity claim relies on subjective interests.
Ethical
behaviour is one of the components taken out of the frame of an allround
objectivity.
Animals get denied for their actions to be viewed as not
insinctual.
Subsequently the VALUES of behaviour get ruled out from being within the ethcial
scale of social
actions between the species, etc.
A term such as 'ethical' desribes something
that is existent, it's not an idea in itself - otherwise it would not exist in
the correlations...
Visit:
The Vegan
Society
Also
visit:
The American Anti-Vivisection Society
Copyright © 2000-2006
Animals.
All rights reserved.
|