Links 07.11.2020: Behindertenstudien, Inklusion<\/p>\n
Hall, Melinda C., “Critical Disability Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Beautiful campaign for inclusion https:\/\/includeusfromthestart.com\/english\/<\/a> by @coordown<\/p>\n David Brehme | Petra Fuchs | Swantje K\u00f6bsell | Carla Wesselmann (Hrsg.), Disability Studies im deutschsprachigen Raum: Zwischen Emanzipation und Vereinnahmung Links 07.11.2020: Behindertenstudien, Inklusion Hall, Melinda C., “Critical Disability Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/disability-critical\/ Critical disability theory challenges the marginalization of the study of disability and its ghettoization within bioethics. Critical disability theory is a diverse set of approaches that largely seek to theorize disability as…Continue reading<\/span>Aha 07.11.2020<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":407,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"templates\/template-cover.php","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,41],"tags":[18],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":221,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions\/221"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simorgh.de\/disablismus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nhttps:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/disability-critical\/<\/a>
\nCritical disability theory challenges the marginalization of the study of disability and its ghettoization within bioethics.<\/em>
\nCritical disability theory is a diverse set of approaches that largely seek to theorize disability as a cultural, political, and social phenomenon, rather than an individualized, medical matter attached to the body.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/edoc.hu-berlin.de\/bitstream\/handle\/18452\/22248\/Disability%20Studies%20im%20deutschsprachigen%20Raum.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"